This post may contain affiliate links. Please read our disclosure policy.

My Experience with WeightWatchers Old Food Based Exchange Plan VS. The WW Points Based Programs

Did you ever have a nagging thought that you just couldn’t get out of your head? Here’s one that I’ve been wrestling with for a while now:

“The old Weight Watchers food based exchange program (Quick Success) from the late 1980s / early 1990s was better for my personal weight loss than counting Points”

This would be quickly followed by: “How could that be?” “You’re nuts.” “Weight Watchers is a huge public company that knows a lot more than you do.” “It’s so retro.”  “It’s just because you learned it first, it’s the plan you had initial success with and became a lifetime member following.” “You’re being nostalgic.”

I did lose weight and become a lifetime member following, Quick Success, Weight Watchers food based exchange program, long before they switched over to Points. I followed the plan, learned a ton about healthy balanced eating and portion control and consistently lost weight week after week.

Naive and cocky, I failed to take maintenance seriously. I thought I’d be able to go it alone—a big mistake in retrospect. Live and learn. I now know that I need systems, discipline, accountability and support to maintain a happy healthy weight. It’s a lifelong journey. 

Martha McKinnon's Weight Watchers Story on Simple Nourished Living: Part 1

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 1

Martha McKinnon's Weight Watchers Story on Simple Nourished Living: Part 2

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 2

Martha McKinnon from Simple Nourished Living Shares Her Weight Watchers Story: Part 3

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 3

How I Came to the Conclusion that WW Food Exchanges Was Better than Points

Recently, I had a lightbulb moment: While I learned the Weight Watchers Points and Points Plus systems, and know how to calculate them, I don’t think in terms of Points, I think in terms of numbers of servings of food groups. What I learned way way back in that early 1990s Weight Watchers exchange plan has stuck with me all these years.

I think because it’s logical. You eat real food from all the food groups: starch, protein, fat, fruits, vegetables, and dairy. You are allotted so many servings from each food group every day. Once you learn serving sizes and number of servings, it’s easy to stay on track.

This way of eating was first developed for diabetics as a way to keep their blood sugar stable. And it worked really well for me. It’s a healthy balanced way of eating. It was “clean eating” back before such a term even existed.

Food exchange programs like this have been around for decades and are well tested. There’s nothing sexy, flashy or trendy about them, but they work. With exchanges you never forget that you are talking about FOOD.

So, while counting points works for some people, so does counting counting calories or food groups, and I think it’s a whole lot simpler, which is important when you are prone to laziness the way I am. When it comes to weight loss, simple is the only thing that has ever worked for me.

Then I read this interesting article in the NYT Article, which agreed with me and essentially said…

“…Recognizing this new evidence, the scientists on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, for the first time in 35 years have sent recommendations to the government without any upper limit on total fat. In addition, reduced-fat foods were specifically not recommended for obesity prevention. Instead, the committee encouraged consumption according to healthful food-based diet patterns

The limit on total fat is an outdated concept, an obstacle to sensible change that promotes harmful low-fat foods, undermines efforts to limit refined grains and added sugars, and discourages the food industry from developing products higher in healthy fats. Fortunately, the people behind the Dietary Guidelines understand that. Will the government, policy makers and the food industry take notice this time?”

It turns out the scientists on the 2105 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee for the US, agree with me 🙂 We should learn to eat according to healthful food-based diet patterns, just like I learned to do back with that old Weight Watchers Quick Start Exchange Program.

The sad thing is that US dietary policy and Weight Watchers can’t change on a dime. It will take years or decades for this information to make its way out to the masses. In the meantime folks will continue to struggle with low fat diet thinking.

 

food collage: oatmeal, salmon, broccoli, eggs, bananas

Why I Think the Old Weight Watchers Food Based Exchange Plan Was Better for Weight Loss

I learned healthy balanced eating and portion control. It was not as restrictive as the Old Original Weight Watchers Plan from the 1960s, but more so than today’s approach which doesn’t provide enough structure and discipline for some folks.

I believe that when you are learning a new skill, such as healthy balanced eating, you need to start with the basics. You need clear instructions and guidance. You essentially need to be told what to do. You need training wheels until you learn to find your balance and begin riding without them.

We somehow have gotten to the place in our development where many of us are completely confused about how to feed ourselves in a healthy balanced way. We are overwhelmed by conflicting information. I was lost and confused when I first began WW back in the early 1990s.

WW Quick Success with it’s food based exchanges taught me a healthy balanced approach to eating that I’ve carried with me through to today.

The exchange lists group foods together because they are alike. Foods on each list have about the same amount of carbohydrate, protein, fat and calories.

a variety of healthy foods on white background

Basics of the Weight Watchers Food Based Exchange Weight Loss Program

Under the Weight Watchers Quick Success Program, as a woman, I was allowed the following each day:

  • 2-3 fruit exchanges
  • 3+ vegetable exchanges
  • 5-6 protein exchanges
  • 2-3 bread/starch exchanges
  • 3 fat exchanges
  • 2 milk exchanges
  • Beginning with the 5th week 1 optional floating exchange
  • Optional calories per week: no more than 150 week 1, no more than 200 week 2 no more than 300 week 3, no more than 400 week 4, no more than 500 week 5 and beyond.

*Men and Youths add 2 Protein Exchanges, 2 Bread Exchanges, and 1 Fruit Exchange; Youths add 1 Milk Exchange

Once you had used up your exchanges and optional calories, the only choice was to supplement with vegetables if you were still hungry. There were days when I ate a lot of vegetables 🙂 Green beans and salsa were a particular favorite.

chunks of melon, raspberries and blueberries in a white bowl

Examples from the WeightWatchers Fruit Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 small fruit like an apple or orange (about 4 ounces or 3/4 cup)
  • 1 cup strawberries
  • 1 cup melon
  • 1/2 banana
  • 1/2 medium grapefruit
  • 1/2 cup blueberries, blackberries, raspberries
  • 12 large or 20 small grapes
  • 1/2 cup canned unsweetened fruit
  • 1/2 cup fruit juice
  • 2 dates
  • 4 dried apricot halves
  • 2 tablespoons raisins

Examples from the Weight Watchers Vegetable Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 cup raw leafy green vegetables like lettuce or spinach
  • 1/2 cup of most other vegetables, raw or cooked
  • 1/2 cup vegetable juice
A photo collage of healthy protein rich foods

Examples from the WeightWatchers Protein Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 ounce cooked meat, poultry or fish
  • 1 egg
  • 1 ounce hard or semisoft cheese
  • 1/3 cup cottage cheese
  • 1/4 cup canned tuna or salmon
  • 3 ounces tofu
  • 1/4 cup cooked dried beans, peas or lentils
a photo collage of healthy starchy foods

Examples from the WeightWatchers Bread/Starch Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1-ounce of bread or crackers
  • 1/2 english muffin
  • 1/2 cup cooked cereal or pasta
  • 3/4 cup cold cereal
  • 1/2 cup starchy vegetable (potatoes, peas, corn)
Olive oil being poured into a spoon

Examples from the WeightWatchers Fat Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 teaspoon oil or butter or margarine or lard or mayonnaise or animal fat
  • 1-1/2 teaspoons salad dressing
a photo still life of dairy rich foods

Examples from the Weight Watchers Milk/Dairy Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 cup skim milk or 1% fat milk
  • 1 cup soy milk
  • 3/4 cup buttermilk
  • 1/3 cup instant nonfat dry milk
  • 1/2 cup low fat yogurt
  • 3/4 cup nonfat yogurt

Sample Daily Menu Based on OLD WW Food Exchanges*

BREAKFAST

  • 1/2 cup Pineapple Chunks
  • 1/3 cup Cottage Cheese
  • 1/2 cup Skim Milk
  • Coffee or Tea

LUNCH

  • Chicken & Swiss on Rye (1-1/2 ounces sliced chicken and 1/2 ounce Swiss cheese, lettuce, and 1 teaspoon mayonnaise on 2 slices reduced calorie rye bread)
  • 6 Celery Sticks and 3 Cherry Tomatoes
  • 1 cup Watermelon Chunks
  • Coffee, Tea or Mineral Water

DINNER

  • 3 ounces Baked Chicken Cutlet sprinkled with Lemon Juice and Chopped Parsley
  • 1 serving Mozzarella, Tomato and Arugula Salad
  • 1/2 cup each cooked Cauliflower and Green Beans
  • 1/2 cup pudding

SNACK

  • 1 cup Strawberries with 1/2 cup Plain Yogurt

*Men and Youths add 2 Protein Exchanges, 2 Bread Exchanges, and 1 Fruit Exchange; Youths add 1 Milk Exchange

This Simple 7-Day WW Friendly No Recipe Meal Plan: Summer Edition is inspired by this easy approach to balanced eating I came to love.

The system provided much more structure than the current points system which was important because I was clueless about how to nourish myself. It forced me to eat in a balanced way that’s effective at keeping hunger at bay.

The old system taught me about what foods are categorized as proteins, starches, fats, fruits, vegetables and milk. And what amount makes a serving. I learned that 1/2 a medium banana or 12 large grapes was equal to 1 fruit exchange and that 1/2 cup of cooked rice or pasta or one one ounce slice of bread equaled one starch exchange.

Sample of Old Weight Watchers Quick Start Food Tracker

Sample of Old Weight Watchers Exchange Food Tracker

These days when I want to track/food journal for a few days, I tend to use a small notebook. I just jot down what I ate for breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks. And I use check marks to keep track of my exchanges:

Example

B) 1/3 cup cottage cheese (1 Protein), 1/2 cup pineapple chunks (1 fruit), 1 slice wheat toast (1 bread)

Milk (2):
Fruit (3):
Veg (3+):
Protein (6):
Bread (2):
Fat (3):
Optional Cals:

Two plates of food being served
Photo by Louis Hansel on Unsplash

A Comparison of WW Food Exchanges VS WW Points

Weight Watchers Food Exchanges Approach:

1. Basis:

  • Concept: This approach categorizes foods into groups based on their macronutrient content (carbohydrates, proteins, fats) and assigns specific portions or “exchanges” for each group.
  • Focus: Emphasizes portion control and balance among different food groups.

2. Pros:

  • Simplicity: It provides a straightforward way to categorize and plan meals.
  • Nutrient Balance: Encourages a balanced intake of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.
  • Education: Helps individuals understand the nutritional composition of different foods.
  • Behavioral Aspects: Includes support groups and focuses on behavior change for long-term success.

3. Cons:

  • Rigidity: Some find the need to track exchanges for every meal can be restrictive.
  • Individual Variability: May not account for individual differences in metabolism or dietary needs.

Weight Watchers Points-Based Approach:

1. Basis:

  • Concept: Assigns a point value to foods based on their nutritional content, with an emphasis on calories, saturated fat, sugar, and protein.
  • Focus: Promotes flexibility by allowing individuals to eat any food within their allocated daily or weekly points.

2. Pros:

  • Flexibility: Allows for a wide variety of foods, as long as individuals stay within their allotted points.
  • Adaptability: Can be personalized based on individual preferences and dietary restrictions.
  • Behavioral Aspects: Includes support groups and focuses on behavior change for long-term success.

3. Cons:

  • Complexity: Some may find the points system complex, especially when starting.
  • Subjectivity: Points are assigned based on specific criteria, which might not perfectly reflect an individual’s nutritional needs.

Summary:

  • The Weight Watchers food exchange-based diet focused on categorizing foods into groups, promoting balance and portion control.
  • The Weight Watchers Points-based approach assigns points to foods based on nutritional content, offering increased flexibility in dietary choices.

Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on individual preferences, lifestyle, and the level of structure or flexibility desired. Some people may find success with one method over the other based on their personal preferences and adherence. The bottom line is that to lose weight you need to figure out a way to eat less (create a calorie deficit) that you can live with.

If Points are working for you and you don’t find the process cumbersome, that’s great. Stick with what is working for you. But if counting points is not working, if calculating them seems overly complicated, or if you feel like you need more structure,  you may want to experiment with the old food based exchange approach, like the one in the Weight Watchers’ Quick Success Program Cookbook.

WW Quick Success Cookbook Cover with Salmon Steak and Book Title

If you are interested in following the old WW Program you can buy the Weight Watchers’ Quick Success Program Cookbook, which includes plan/program details and 5 weeks of Meal Plans on Amazon. 

My Favorite WW Cookbooks with Food Exchange Information

WeightWatchers included food exchange details in their cookbooks published through 1999. Some of my favorite WW Cookbooks with exchange information are:

I’ve had this cookbook since my initial go-around with Weight Watchers back in the early 1990s. Because the recipes were contributed by Weight Watchers members, staff and magazine readers they are simpler and down-home in nature.

More Interesting Reading About Food Exchange Plans

More Helpful Articles for WeightWatchers

Originally published July 2015; Updated with new photos and content January 2023

About Martha McKinnon

Weight Watchers Lifetime Member, Yoga Practitioner and Blogger who loves to share her passion for trying to create a happy, healthy, balanced life in what often feels like an overwhelming out of control world.

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

383 Comments

  1. I was so happy to find this site. I lost 60 pounds on the exchange program.
    I still have some of my old books from back then, but I didn’t have week 1 with all the amounts. I was so excited to see you had this information. I feel like now I can get back on track. The points system was no good for me. Thank you so much for posting this.

  2. Hi! I just found this as I was looking up info on the 1980s WW system. I was on the program in 1988 when I was 17. I went to meetings with my dad. I lost 23 pounds (I thought I was fat but I wasn’t really) on it and I learned better eating habits. Unfortunately after having thyroid surgery in the mid 90s plus being on nasty meds, I gained a lot of weight. 25 years later and still struggling. I have been trying the points system on and off for 10 years and it’s okay but I tend to cheat and rebel on it. I do like some of the recipes on the app though – I like to find better alternatives for the recipes that still taste good. My husband suggested going back to the “old school” system of writing it all down and checking it off like I used to. Planning on searching for all the cookbooks from then!

  3. Hi Marie
    I could have written your post myself. The old programme is the only diet plan that has ever worked for me. I have joined and rejoined so many times but just have not been able to settle into the new WW programmes. I have been doing (suffering) Keto for two weeks and I’m determined to see out another 2 weeks After that, I’m going back to the old WW programme from the 70s and 80s because that’s what I feel happiest about.
    Good luck.

  4. The “Old” WW PLAN is the only plan that works for me! I can eat and still lose weight!

  5. i have used the selection plan list including two extra lists at the bottom to tell you how tocount things like pizza, tamales etc in terms of fats bread protein on your daily count. it gave you 3 personal selections, 700 extra points a week and i make little boxes every day for milk, fruit, fat, protein and bread. i call this my life eating plan but i really need those selection plan lists. can you send it to me via email.

  6. Thank you so much for this article and posting the exchanges! I got to lifetime way back then and then got to goal again following points. I was also a very successful WW leader for 12 years. Flash forward 30 years and weight loss is a struggle with points. Losing weight while learning the proper nutrition was basic and it worked. I’m back on track to relearn portions. I’d love to be part of a group pursuing this way of losing weight! Thanks again!

  7. I just replied to a Facebook post which I decided was too lengthily an answer to “do we earn points for drinking water…. I deleted it but here is my lengthy response (which sent me on a Google search to find this post!): “yes there has always been a water tally because you should drink water. But it has no points either way. So back to points just being points. WW keeps trying to have us make healthier choices and I commend the 2022 plan for trying to do so. Apparently it was just too much…. Older WW had you check off food groups and portions sizes. It was the best well rounded but very tight. No room for dairy free or vegetarian for example. But you HAD to have your 4 vegetables and three fruits a day. And 2 proteins, 2 dairy, etc. This was 40 years ago! Switching to points was huge. It offered more flexibility but also lends itself to “points are points”. You can have 23 healthy points or 23 points of Cheetos. And then WW get complaints like “why do avocados have points? They are healthy”. Yes, eat avocados please. But count the points. Not all points are equal but still they are points. The zero points food were added to at least encourage some healthy choices. WW keeps researching and trying to make the plan both “doable” and “healthier”. Last year was a valiant attempt but sadly failed. Some of us have a hard time with hunger ques and eat without hunger. That’s where those zero point foods fail. And earning points back gave a mindset of “if I eat 3 pounds of spinach I’ll earn enough points for this brownie”, ?. Sigh. So now we are back to just drinking water. On our own. Because we should. I think the move away from in person meetings makes it harder. Going to a meeting every week was a continuing education as well as support. Definitely in person meetings and weigh ins (encouraged NOT to weigh at home) has the most success. But it’s a business and people want to have lower cost and do it at home only. PS WW always became free after lifetime. So with sooner achievements of goal and maintenance the cost could potentially be cheaper in the long run. But I digress.” A few funnies- I recall my WW leader back then saying “all grapes as small” lol. And that ketchup didn’t count. Also I never could wrap my head around bananas not having points. I think if WW in 3 phases for me. Phase 1 the exchanges from my first lifetime achieved in 1985. Phase 2 a points program where I achieved again in 2000 and Phase 3 the points program most closely to the current plan where chicken and bananas are zero points! Made and maintained for 5 years. I attribute my early learning back in the 80’s to my overall success and understanding of the goal. And I’ve shared at meetings (pre Covid) about the danger of just points and trying to work the system instead of eating well. I’m struggling now due to a debilitating disease and have not used points in a healthy way. I might get that book to reacquaint myself to real food. Track points (I value their place and effectiveness) but also with the exchanges in mind. THANK YOU!!!

  8. I loved the old program! I lost 75 pounds on it and maintained it for 30 years. Now I tried the new one and I can see how easy it is to eat more hidden calories with it. I think I’ll get back to the old ways… thank you for reminding me!

    1. Congratulations on that 30 yr maintenance!! Not a fan of any of the newer plans since my 1988 original (Quick Start) program. The newer plans are more flexible, but allow non-foods ( junk food, fast food, candy, wine) as everyday points (if I’m wrong correct me) And NO food in my eyes is ZERO points…. except maybe celery. If it’s going in, it needs to be counted. I guess to-each-his-own, and I’ll always stick to the “Quick Start” plan.

  9. Thank you for writing about the old program. I loved that program and lost 35lbs with it. I have since went back to WW many times but did not like it. I did the keto diet lost weight. I lost with keto but in the back of my mind was the old WW plan that I liked. Thank you for posting this.

  10. I have started a FB group called Weight Watchers exchange plan followers . There we can swap recipes, ideas and helpful tips to those of us who are dyed in the wool exchange plan people! It is a plan we know works and easy to follow. Join us!

      1. Thanks! It’s so new…I don’t see your request….I’ll add you once I see it or can find where it is (:

        1. Hi Laura. I just sent a request to join. I have been looking for something like this. I too lost lots of weight with the old plan. Structure works best for me.