This post may contain affiliate links. Please read our disclosure policy.

My Experience with WeightWatchers Old Food Based Exchange Plan VS. The WW Points Based Programs

Did you ever have a nagging thought that you just couldn’t get out of your head? Here’s one that I’ve been wrestling with for a while now:

“The old Weight Watchers food based exchange program (Quick Success) from the late 1980s / early 1990s was better for my personal weight loss than counting Points”

This would be quickly followed by: “How could that be?” “You’re nuts.” “Weight Watchers is a huge public company that knows a lot more than you do.” “It’s so retro.”  “It’s just because you learned it first, it’s the plan you had initial success with and became a lifetime member following.” “You’re being nostalgic.”

I did lose weight and become a lifetime member following, Quick Success, Weight Watchers food based exchange program, long before they switched over to Points. I followed the plan, learned a ton about healthy balanced eating and portion control and consistently lost weight week after week.

Naive and cocky, I failed to take maintenance seriously. I thought I’d be able to go it alone—a big mistake in retrospect. Live and learn. I now know that I need systems, discipline, accountability and support to maintain a happy healthy weight. It’s a lifelong journey. 

Martha McKinnon's Weight Watchers Story on Simple Nourished Living: Part 1

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 1

Martha McKinnon's Weight Watchers Story on Simple Nourished Living: Part 2

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 2

Martha McKinnon from Simple Nourished Living Shares Her Weight Watchers Story: Part 3

Martha McKinnon’s Weight Watchers Story: Part 3

How I Came to the Conclusion that WW Food Exchanges Was Better than Points

Recently, I had a lightbulb moment: While I learned the Weight Watchers Points and Points Plus systems, and know how to calculate them, I don’t think in terms of Points, I think in terms of numbers of servings of food groups. What I learned way way back in that early 1990s Weight Watchers exchange plan has stuck with me all these years.

I think because it’s logical. You eat real food from all the food groups: starch, protein, fat, fruits, vegetables, and dairy. You are allotted so many servings from each food group every day. Once you learn serving sizes and number of servings, it’s easy to stay on track.

This way of eating was first developed for diabetics as a way to keep their blood sugar stable. And it worked really well for me. It’s a healthy balanced way of eating. It was “clean eating” back before such a term even existed.

Food exchange programs like this have been around for decades and are well tested. There’s nothing sexy, flashy or trendy about them, but they work. With exchanges you never forget that you are talking about FOOD.

So, while counting points works for some people, so does counting counting calories or food groups, and I think it’s a whole lot simpler, which is important when you are prone to laziness the way I am. When it comes to weight loss, simple is the only thing that has ever worked for me.

Then I read this interesting article in the NYT Article, which agreed with me and essentially said…

“…Recognizing this new evidence, the scientists on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, for the first time in 35 years have sent recommendations to the government without any upper limit on total fat. In addition, reduced-fat foods were specifically not recommended for obesity prevention. Instead, the committee encouraged consumption according to healthful food-based diet patterns

The limit on total fat is an outdated concept, an obstacle to sensible change that promotes harmful low-fat foods, undermines efforts to limit refined grains and added sugars, and discourages the food industry from developing products higher in healthy fats. Fortunately, the people behind the Dietary Guidelines understand that. Will the government, policy makers and the food industry take notice this time?”

It turns out the scientists on the 2105 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee for the US, agree with me 🙂 We should learn to eat according to healthful food-based diet patterns, just like I learned to do back with that old Weight Watchers Quick Start Exchange Program.

The sad thing is that US dietary policy and Weight Watchers can’t change on a dime. It will take years or decades for this information to make its way out to the masses. In the meantime folks will continue to struggle with low fat diet thinking.

 

food collage: oatmeal, salmon, broccoli, eggs, bananas

Why I Think the Old Weight Watchers Food Based Exchange Plan Was Better for Weight Loss

I learned healthy balanced eating and portion control. It was not as restrictive as the Old Original Weight Watchers Plan from the 1960s, but more so than today’s approach which doesn’t provide enough structure and discipline for some folks.

I believe that when you are learning a new skill, such as healthy balanced eating, you need to start with the basics. You need clear instructions and guidance. You essentially need to be told what to do. You need training wheels until you learn to find your balance and begin riding without them.

We somehow have gotten to the place in our development where many of us are completely confused about how to feed ourselves in a healthy balanced way. We are overwhelmed by conflicting information. I was lost and confused when I first began WW back in the early 1990s.

WW Quick Success with it’s food based exchanges taught me a healthy balanced approach to eating that I’ve carried with me through to today.

The exchange lists group foods together because they are alike. Foods on each list have about the same amount of carbohydrate, protein, fat and calories.

a variety of healthy foods on white background

Basics of the Weight Watchers Food Based Exchange Weight Loss Program

Under the Weight Watchers Quick Success Program, as a woman, I was allowed the following each day:

  • 2-3 fruit exchanges
  • 3+ vegetable exchanges
  • 5-6 protein exchanges
  • 2-3 bread/starch exchanges
  • 3 fat exchanges
  • 2 milk exchanges
  • Beginning with the 5th week 1 optional floating exchange
  • Optional calories per week: no more than 150 week 1, no more than 200 week 2 no more than 300 week 3, no more than 400 week 4, no more than 500 week 5 and beyond.

*Men and Youths add 2 Protein Exchanges, 2 Bread Exchanges, and 1 Fruit Exchange; Youths add 1 Milk Exchange

Once you had used up your exchanges and optional calories, the only choice was to supplement with vegetables if you were still hungry. There were days when I ate a lot of vegetables 🙂 Green beans and salsa were a particular favorite.

chunks of melon, raspberries and blueberries in a white bowl

Examples from the WeightWatchers Fruit Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 small fruit like an apple or orange (about 4 ounces or 3/4 cup)
  • 1 cup strawberries
  • 1 cup melon
  • 1/2 banana
  • 1/2 medium grapefruit
  • 1/2 cup blueberries, blackberries, raspberries
  • 12 large or 20 small grapes
  • 1/2 cup canned unsweetened fruit
  • 1/2 cup fruit juice
  • 2 dates
  • 4 dried apricot halves
  • 2 tablespoons raisins

Examples from the Weight Watchers Vegetable Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 cup raw leafy green vegetables like lettuce or spinach
  • 1/2 cup of most other vegetables, raw or cooked
  • 1/2 cup vegetable juice
A photo collage of healthy protein rich foods

Examples from the WeightWatchers Protein Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 ounce cooked meat, poultry or fish
  • 1 egg
  • 1 ounce hard or semisoft cheese
  • 1/3 cup cottage cheese
  • 1/4 cup canned tuna or salmon
  • 3 ounces tofu
  • 1/4 cup cooked dried beans, peas or lentils
a photo collage of healthy starchy foods

Examples from the WeightWatchers Bread/Starch Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1-ounce of bread or crackers
  • 1/2 english muffin
  • 1/2 cup cooked cereal or pasta
  • 3/4 cup cold cereal
  • 1/2 cup starchy vegetable (potatoes, peas, corn)
Olive oil being poured into a spoon

Examples from the WeightWatchers Fat Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 teaspoon oil or butter or margarine or lard or mayonnaise or animal fat
  • 1-1/2 teaspoons salad dressing
a photo still life of dairy rich foods

Examples from the Weight Watchers Milk/Dairy Exchange Group

Generally 1 serving is equal to:

  • 1 cup skim milk or 1% fat milk
  • 1 cup soy milk
  • 3/4 cup buttermilk
  • 1/3 cup instant nonfat dry milk
  • 1/2 cup low fat yogurt
  • 3/4 cup nonfat yogurt

Sample Daily Menu Based on OLD WW Food Exchanges*

BREAKFAST

  • 1/2 cup Pineapple Chunks
  • 1/3 cup Cottage Cheese
  • 1/2 cup Skim Milk
  • Coffee or Tea

LUNCH

  • Chicken & Swiss on Rye (1-1/2 ounces sliced chicken and 1/2 ounce Swiss cheese, lettuce, and 1 teaspoon mayonnaise on 2 slices reduced calorie rye bread)
  • 6 Celery Sticks and 3 Cherry Tomatoes
  • 1 cup Watermelon Chunks
  • Coffee, Tea or Mineral Water

DINNER

  • 3 ounces Baked Chicken Cutlet sprinkled with Lemon Juice and Chopped Parsley
  • 1 serving Mozzarella, Tomato and Arugula Salad
  • 1/2 cup each cooked Cauliflower and Green Beans
  • 1/2 cup pudding

SNACK

  • 1 cup Strawberries with 1/2 cup Plain Yogurt

*Men and Youths add 2 Protein Exchanges, 2 Bread Exchanges, and 1 Fruit Exchange; Youths add 1 Milk Exchange

This Simple 7-Day WW Friendly No Recipe Meal Plan: Summer Edition is inspired by this easy approach to balanced eating I came to love.

The system provided much more structure than the current points system which was important because I was clueless about how to nourish myself. It forced me to eat in a balanced way that’s effective at keeping hunger at bay.

The old system taught me about what foods are categorized as proteins, starches, fats, fruits, vegetables and milk. And what amount makes a serving. I learned that 1/2 a medium banana or 12 large grapes was equal to 1 fruit exchange and that 1/2 cup of cooked rice or pasta or one one ounce slice of bread equaled one starch exchange.

Sample of Old Weight Watchers Quick Start Food Tracker

Sample of Old Weight Watchers Exchange Food Tracker

These days when I want to track/food journal for a few days, I tend to use a small notebook. I just jot down what I ate for breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks. And I use check marks to keep track of my exchanges:

Example

B) 1/3 cup cottage cheese (1 Protein), 1/2 cup pineapple chunks (1 fruit), 1 slice wheat toast (1 bread)

Milk (2):
Fruit (3):
Veg (3+):
Protein (6):
Bread (2):
Fat (3):
Optional Cals:

Two plates of food being served
Photo by Louis Hansel on Unsplash

A Comparison of WW Food Exchanges VS WW Points

Weight Watchers Food Exchanges Approach:

1. Basis:

  • Concept: This approach categorizes foods into groups based on their macronutrient content (carbohydrates, proteins, fats) and assigns specific portions or “exchanges” for each group.
  • Focus: Emphasizes portion control and balance among different food groups.

2. Pros:

  • Simplicity: It provides a straightforward way to categorize and plan meals.
  • Nutrient Balance: Encourages a balanced intake of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.
  • Education: Helps individuals understand the nutritional composition of different foods.
  • Behavioral Aspects: Includes support groups and focuses on behavior change for long-term success.

3. Cons:

  • Rigidity: Some find the need to track exchanges for every meal can be restrictive.
  • Individual Variability: May not account for individual differences in metabolism or dietary needs.

Weight Watchers Points-Based Approach:

1. Basis:

  • Concept: Assigns a point value to foods based on their nutritional content, with an emphasis on calories, saturated fat, sugar, and protein.
  • Focus: Promotes flexibility by allowing individuals to eat any food within their allocated daily or weekly points.

2. Pros:

  • Flexibility: Allows for a wide variety of foods, as long as individuals stay within their allotted points.
  • Adaptability: Can be personalized based on individual preferences and dietary restrictions.
  • Behavioral Aspects: Includes support groups and focuses on behavior change for long-term success.

3. Cons:

  • Complexity: Some may find the points system complex, especially when starting.
  • Subjectivity: Points are assigned based on specific criteria, which might not perfectly reflect an individual’s nutritional needs.

Summary:

  • The Weight Watchers food exchange-based diet focused on categorizing foods into groups, promoting balance and portion control.
  • The Weight Watchers Points-based approach assigns points to foods based on nutritional content, offering increased flexibility in dietary choices.

Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on individual preferences, lifestyle, and the level of structure or flexibility desired. Some people may find success with one method over the other based on their personal preferences and adherence. The bottom line is that to lose weight you need to figure out a way to eat less (create a calorie deficit) that you can live with.

If Points are working for you and you don’t find the process cumbersome, that’s great. Stick with what is working for you. But if counting points is not working, if calculating them seems overly complicated, or if you feel like you need more structure,  you may want to experiment with the old food based exchange approach, like the one in the Weight Watchers’ Quick Success Program Cookbook.

WW Quick Success Cookbook Cover with Salmon Steak and Book Title

If you are interested in following the old WW Program you can buy the Weight Watchers’ Quick Success Program Cookbook, which includes plan/program details and 5 weeks of Meal Plans on Amazon. 

My Favorite WW Cookbooks with Food Exchange Information

WeightWatchers included food exchange details in their cookbooks published through 1999. Some of my favorite WW Cookbooks with exchange information are:

I’ve had this cookbook since my initial go-around with Weight Watchers back in the early 1990s. Because the recipes were contributed by Weight Watchers members, staff and magazine readers they are simpler and down-home in nature.

More Interesting Reading About Food Exchange Plans

More Helpful Articles for WeightWatchers

Originally published July 2015; Updated with new photos and content January 2023

About Martha McKinnon

Weight Watchers Lifetime Member, Yoga Practitioner and Blogger who loves to share her passion for trying to create a happy, healthy, balanced life in what often feels like an overwhelming out of control world.

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

383 Comments

  1. Does anyone know how to breakdown a frozen meal such as lean cuisine or smart ones? That’s what was so great when it was “The Quick Success Program”. It was broken down and put on the box. Now it’s just points and I hate the points system.

  2. I used this plan in 1992 and it worked wonders. I was 155 lbs. 34 yrs. 5″7′ and in good shape but thought I was overweight. I went on this for about 6-8 weeks and lost 20 lbs. Now 30 years later I’m way overweight but held on to all my paperwork and started it a week ago. I honestly can say I already feel better. I did not weigh myself as it is way too depressing..lol. So I’ll just go by how my clothes feel. I have found that Wal Mart has ready made salads, so when I’m out I grab one of those. And they are actually really good. Good luck everyone!!

  3. I love the old WW Quick Success from the 80”s
    I have 6 cookbooks and a lot of the old print outs
    I lost a lot of weight on this plan doing it myself
    it is very similar to diabetic style
    You can sometimes find the old cookbooks at thrift stores
    Always look at a recipe to make sure it list as 4P, 1B, etc and not points

  4. Thank you for this. It reminds me of back in the day, I had to see a nutritionist to GAIN weight and eat balanced. I had found out I couldn’t eat dairy, wheat and was sensitive to sugar (it showed on my blood test). If you cut sugar you cut a WHOLE lot of calories and I didn’t know this. The nutritionist used an exchange system that looked like this, I wonder if it’s what she used. Way too long ago though.

    I wonder if you would consider a group or separate blog for those of us that want to follow this. The Smart Points is ok, but I am not losing like I did when I first started. At 54, I am looking for consistency, this seems like it fits the bill. Thanks for your work here. ~Dee

    1. Hi Dee, Thanks for your comment. If you start a Facebook group or find one, please let me know. I would be happy to participate. ~Martha

  5. I also loved the old weight watchers. I have the old cookbook, but I wish there was a Facebook group for it so that we could all share recipes with each other!!

    1. Hi Vicki, Why don’t you start an Old WW Recipe Facebook group??? Let me know and I’ll be happy to join!!!

  6. I have been a Weight Watchers since 1972,
    Maintained my weight for about 10 years hurt my back and gained some weight. Went back in 83, became a leader the first week of January 1984, was a leader for 14 years. I think Weight Watchers needs to go back to what made the best. I see on Facebook and YouTube how many people are not happy with the new program. It has also gotten way to expensive for a 30 minute meeting . I am under my goal but still go to meetings every week if I can. One thing I do not understand is why the leaders and weighers do not have to be at goal.

  7. I have been wishing I could find this plan again! It was so much more effective for me than the new plan. I find I no longer know how t eat healthy potions and complete meals. I ordered the cookbook and can’t wait to get started! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!

  8. Thank you Martha,
    I’ve been trying to use the latest points+ program, and often come up at the end of the day without using up all my points. I rarely go over my limit, but the plan just doesn’t seem to work.

    My first time with WW was in the 70’s, again in the 80’s and the mid 2000’s. I’ve always stuck fairly close to the ww plan in terms of food choices, but my problem has always been portions. With the old plans it was fairly easy to regulate portions. I knew I could have 4oz of chicken or fish. Now, I still weigh it out, but it’s loosy-goosy, maybe 4 or maybe 8. On the P+ plan, either are good.

    I’ve wanted to go back but couldn’t remember the old plan. I need something more concrete, so thank you for your info. Maybe this time will work. 🙂

    -J

    1. Such an interesting article, thank you. I did WW in the late 80’s with great success. I lost the 25 lbs. that I needed to lose. I have always thought it was the very best plan. It provided appropriate amounts of all the food groups. You could see at a glance what you had left (probably veggies) and what you where all out of (probably bread). With the optional calories I was even able to have a glass of lite white wine every day. That was a luxury. It was a healthful way to eat where no food group was demonized. No WW plan since has even come close. These days I struggle with 5 to 10 extra lbs. that come and go. I think I will resurrect the old plan even just for the fact that it insures a proper mix of nutrients. I am about to be 85 years old and want to remain strong and healthy as well as maintain my weight.

  9. Thank you For sharing this information!
    I have missed this plan! I lost over 60 pounds and hit goal with this plan after my son was born.
    The big refrigerator magnet was on the front of my refrigerator until 1995. It truly helped me to maintain. Unfortunately when the refrigerator was replaced the magnet was lost along with the measurements and exchange info. The weight slowly increased even though every year I would start again with a “new” plan.
    I just went to Amazon and ordered the cookbook and I’m so excited to start again!